Case Law
Rule 22: Determination of value-based fee for the infringement action

Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU), Order dated 23/12/2024, Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy v. Microsoft Corporation (Case/ Registry number: APL_67135/2024, ORD_67910/2024)
Example of decision on determination of the value of the action: "The impugned order does not adversely affect Microsoft and does not require further clarification of the scope and limits of the court’s powers. The determination of the value of the action will be the responsibility of the judge-rapporteur during the interim procedure, pursuant to R 22, 104 and 370.6 RoP, as already explained by the CFI (impugned order, paragraph 6). In doing so, the judgerapporteur shall take into account the value as assessed by the parties, pursuant to R 22 RoP, and his assessment of the value shall reflect “the objective interest pursued by the filing party at the time of filing the action” (R 370.6 RoP)."